Choosing the right blockchain stack can feel like a technical decision - but in practice, it determines how fast you can ship, how secure your contracts are, and how expensive maintenance becomes.
Rust-based execution runs tests significantly faster – often 2–10× faster depending on project size and test complexity – helping teams ship confidently and reduce iteration cycles
Requires developers to adapt to a new syntax
OpenZeppelin / Defender
Proven contract standards and automated operations
Limited flexibility for custom setups
Tenderly
Real-time simulation and error tracing
Paid features at scale
So what?
If your goal is speed and predictable releases, Foundry offers faster testing and CI/CD integration.
Hardhat, meanwhile, fits perfectly for teams already fluent in TypeScript who need quick iteration and plugin flexibility.
Security by Design - Beyond the Language
Smart contract security isn’t guaranteed by the language you choose - it’s how your team builds, tests, and deploys.
CIDT integrates security at every delivery stage, treating audits as part of development rather than an afterthought.
Risk
Mitigation
Tools / Standards
Reentrancy
State-before-interaction design
OpenZeppelin ReentrancyGuard
Overflow / underflow
Checked math
Solidity ^0.8+, Rust safe math
Access control
Role-based, multi-sig governance
OZ AccessControl, Safe
Upgradability flaws
Proxy audits, locked logic versions
Hardhat Verify, OZ Upgrades
Third-party code
Static analysis and dependency scanning
Slither, MythX, Soteria
Takeaway: frameworks like Foundry or OpenZeppelin don’t make code secure by default - they make secure workflows repeatable.
Rust - Performance and Safety for Critical Systems
When reliability is non-negotiable, Rust stands out.
It powers leading networks such as Solana, Polkadot, and NEAR, where performance and security define user trust.
Learning Rust takes time - typically 8–12 weeks for mid-level developers to move from syntax to production-ready contracts - but that investment pays off in long-term stability and fewer runtime issues.
Projects built with Rust tend to show fewer post-launch defects and stronger performance under load - key for DeFi, staking, and validator networks.
Performance and Scalability - Matching the Tool to the Task
Ecosystem
Observed TPS (2025)
Time to Finality
Architecture Highlights
Solana
2 000–4 000 (avg mainnet)
~400 ms
Parallel Sealevel runtime (monolithic L1)
NEAR
~30–50
~1.2 s
Nightshade sharded PoS
Aptos / Sui (Move)
~60–70
<1 s
Parallel Block-STM / Narwhal-Bullshark
Cosmos / CosmWasm
3–4 (per zone)
~ 6 s
Deterministic WASM VM + IBC interoperability
EVM / Foundry
19 (L1 only)
60–90 s
Layer-2 centric ecosystem (Rollups, zkEVM, OP Stack)
So what: Rust and Move deliver high throughput for financial protocols, while Cosmos excels in interoperability and deterministic cost modeling. EVM tools remain unbeatable for reach and liquidity.
Move - Security Through Formal Verification
Move brings resource-based safety to smart contract logic.
Its Move Prover mathematically verifies that contract behavior matches declared rules - reducing logic errors before audits begin.
But formal verification isn’t a substitute for manual review: it covers logic integrity, not business-logic or integration risks.
The ecosystem also remains young, with a smaller pool of auditors and production-ready libraries.
What it means for your team:
Move offers strong guarantees for compliance-driven DeFi or regulated finance - but plan for additional time and specialized expertise.
CosmWasm - Precision and Cross-Chain Power
Built on WebAssembly, CosmWasm powers the Cosmos IBC ecosystem - connecting blockchains through standardized, secure smart contracts.
Its strength lies in deterministic execution and now, mature gas profiling.
Gas Profiling in 2025 — From Estimates to Insight
Since CosmWasm 2.0 (Dec 2024) and 2.1 (Q1 2025), developers gain real-time visibility into gas costs without performance loss.
Tool
What It Provides (2025)
Key Improvements (since 2024)
Typical Use
CosmJS / CosmCLI
Per-message gas logs (execute / instantiate / query)
JSON debug outputs
Quick validation
CosmOrc
Detailed storage vs compute reports
5× faster profiling
Integration testing
Tracing
On-chain execution visualization
UI support for Neutron / Hub
IBC transactions
cosmwasm-vm Debug Handler
Stack-level gas/time logs
Full-stack profiling
CI/CD benchmarking
Project impact:
Predictable gas costs across chains
Faster audits (≈30% shorter optimization loops)
Early detection of DoS-sensitive bottlenecks
CosmWasm’s VM has always been precise - now the tooling around it finally matches that precision.
Choosing a Tool = Choosing an Ecosystem
Every language ties you to specific infrastructure and developer communities. Understanding that lock-in helps you plan migration paths early.
Stack
Primary Ecosystem
Migration Risk
Portability
Solidity (EVM)
Ethereum + L2s (Arbitrum, zkSync)
Low
Broadest support
Rust (Solana, NEAR, Polkadot)
Multiple runtimes
Medium
Framework-specific
Move (Aptos / Sui)
Closed ecosystems
High
Limited auditors
CosmWasm
Cosmos-based chains
High
IBC-only portability
For cross-chain projects: modularize business logic, abstract APIs, and maintain EVM interfaces when possible to reduce future migration costs.
Real-World Engineering Challenges
Even with mature tooling, blockchain engineering has its persistent realities.
Challenge
Why It Matters
Typical Solution
MEV (Miner Extractable Value)
Distorts DeFi fairness
Private mempools, order-flow auction
State bloat on L1
Slows validation & increases costs
Pruning, compression, L2 migration
Upgrade vs immutability
Proxy patterns risk governance bugs
Strict audit & multi-sig checks
Cross-chain latency
Finality mismatch between networks
Caching & optimistic verification
Choosing the Right Stack
Stack
Best For
Key Strengths
Trade-offs
Solidity + Foundry
DeFi, NFT, L2 MVPs
Fast iteration, largest ecosystem
Moderate scalability, MEV risk
Rust + Anchor / ink!
Finance, validators
High throughput, memory safety
Steeper onboarding, complex debugging
Move + Prover
Institutional DeFi
Formal verification, logic safety
Smaller auditor pool, ecosystem lock-in
CosmWasm + IBC
Cross-chain protocols
Predictable gas, interoperability
Higher latency, Cosmos-only scope
Plan. Build. Verify.
In 2025, successful blockchain delivery is no longer about writing the fastest code - it’s about creating secure, testable, and observable systems that evolve predictably.
CIDT helps teams design, test, and deploy smart contracts with the right balance of speed, safety, and flexibility - from prototype to production.
Choosing the right blockchain stack defines not just your tech base, but how fast, secure, and scalable your product can become.
This guide from CIDT compares Solidity, Rust, Move, and CosmWasm ecosystems in 2025 - showing how each impacts delivery speed, audit readiness, and long-term maintainability.
CIDT Team
,
Content Writer
All
Web3/Blockchain
October 16, 2025
•
8 min
Why QA Testing in Product Releases Protects Your Business
QA isn’t just about finding bugs — it protects your business from costly risks. Skipping QA can mean lost revenue, churn, and broken trust. This post shows why QA is essential for predictable releases and how it saves time, money, and reputation.
Oleksandra Tkalych
,
QA Lead at CIDT
All
Stay ahead with insights on blockchain, HealthTech, and product delivery.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thanks for your message!
We’ll review your message and get back to you within 24–48 hours. Need to talk sooner? Schedule a quick session with our team
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.